Skip to Content

### Anticipating Reforms: Superintendents’ Frustration with AEAs Sparks Excitement

  • David Smith serves as the superintendent of schools in Spirit Lake, while Todd Abrahamson holds the position of superintendent of schools in Okoboji.

Collaboration and unity among all stakeholders within the education system play a pivotal role in achieving favorable outcomes. Since January, there has been a surge of opposition from educators and education stakeholders towards a proposed bill. Subsequently, the original bill underwent amendments, resulting in the creation of two new bills from the House and one from the Senate. We are currently at a crucial juncture in the legislative process, necessitating the voices of educators advocating for AEA reform to be heard.

Numerous school superintendents statewide have long voiced their frustrations with the AEAs, emphasizing the overdue need for reform and the anticipated positive outcomes. Central to this reform is granting districts the autonomy to allocate funds according to their specific student and district requirements, thereby ensuring transparency in expenditure and alignment with district goals. The proposed oversight not only enhances accountability but also aims to improve student outcomes significantly.

While there are favorable aspects in each of the bills under consideration, only one can ultimately be passed. For superintendents, the primary focus lies in reallocating funds to school districts, enabling them to make decisions on fund utilization in alignment with their unique goals and needs. The transition for media and education services funds to school districts is recommended for the 2024-25 school year, with a subsequent move for special education funds in the following year. This phased approach allows for adequate planning, benefiting both schools and AEAs while fostering a mutually beneficial partnership.

The proposed bills offer districts various options, empowering them to continue utilizing AEA services or selectively opt for services that best cater to their needs, including collaborating with external agencies. Notably, the preservation of AEA services remains an option, with no proposal suggesting their closure. However, for proponents of a more direct impact on student outcomes, the availability of funding presents opportunities for tailored initiatives, partnerships, and enhanced student support networks.

A contrasting perspective underscores the transformative potential of reform, as shared with Governor Reynolds during a recent meeting with regional superintendents. Acknowledging the governor’s receptiveness to feedback, educators are now advocating for legislative actions that prioritize student success through collaborative efforts and fair teacher salary increments.

Amidst these discussions, the imperative of understanding and addressing teachers’ needs, particularly concerning equitable salary adjustments, emerges as a significant focal point. The proposed two-tiered approach to raise teacher pay and district salary supplements aims to enhance starting salaries and overall remuneration for educators, fostering a conducive environment for attracting and retaining talented professionals in the field of education.

The prevailing sentiment among many school superintendents statewide underscores the potential for positive transformation through AEA reform, emphasizing the importance of empowering districts with financial autonomy to drive impactful decision-making. Concurrently, the emphasis on enhancing teacher compensation is recognized as pivotal in elevating the status of the teaching profession and ensuring a sustainable pipeline of dedicated educators.

David Smith, superintendent of schools in Spirit Lake, and Todd Abrahamson, superintendent of schools in Okoboji, bring unique perspectives to the ongoing discourse surrounding education reform.