Get stories like these delivered directly to your email inbox.
The 74 has teamed up with Stanford University’s Hoover Institution to mark the 40th anniversary of the ‘A Nation At Risk’ report. Hoover’s initiative features insights and analysis from experts, educators, and policymakers on the broader impact of 40 years of education reform since the groundbreaking 1983 report. This project includes a chapter on curriculum reform as a potential avenue for assisting more students.
A few years back, after teaching fifth grade in the South Bronx and navigating the realms of public policy and education reform, I attended an event in New York City where Michelle Rhee was honored with the Manhattan Institute’s Urban Innovator Award. At that time, Rhee, the former chancellor of Washington, DC, schools, was a prominent figure in the education reform movement. She had implemented high-profile reforms like school closures and performance-based teacher pay. Despite her focus on political advocacy through initiatives like Students First, my perspective as a classroom teacher and curriculum reform advocate led me to question the emphasis on political campaigns over curriculum improvement.
In a conversation with Rhee, I raised concerns about evaluating teachers without considering factors like training and curriculum support. Her response, dismissing the importance of curriculum battles, underscored a common theme in the education reform movement at the time, prioritizing structural changes over curriculum content.
Over a decade later, the encounter with Rhee still resonates. While confronting issues like teacher pay and tenure is crucial, neglecting the significance of curriculum content in improving student outcomes is a missed opportunity.
The prevailing structural reform approach, which downplays the role of curriculum in student success, has shown limited effectiveness over time. Despite some gains in early 21st-century assessments, overall progress has been modest, raising questions about the impact of traditional education reform strategies.
As the education reform landscape evolved into a technocratic regime, fatigue and skepticism among stakeholders grew, leading to a shift in focus towards urgent issues like learning loss and student well-being.
With the decline of the traditional education reform agenda, the spotlight is now on instructional reform as the next frontier in education improvement. Recognizing the critical role of curriculum in student achievement, especially in providing high-quality instructional materials, is gaining traction as a key strategy for enhancing teaching practices and student outcomes.
Acknowledging the challenges in implementing effective curriculum and the need for comprehensive support, particularly in professional development, underscores the importance of reevaluating the teacher’s role in curriculum design and delivery.
In conclusion, the shift towards instructional reform, with a strong emphasis on curriculum quality and implementation, signifies a new direction in education improvement efforts. By prioritizing curriculum content and supporting teachers in effective curriculum utilization, the education sector can pave the way for meaningful and sustainable progress in student learning.
For more insights, you can explore the full Hoover Institution initiative here.