Skip to Content

### Debate Over Assessment Value Intensifies as San Antonio Schools Struggle in State Rankings

San Antonio educational institutions are lagging behind, as per the most recent assessment by Children at Risk, a nonprofit organization based in Houston. The utilization of letter grades linked to standardized test results portrays a grim scenario, with only one local school making it to the top 20 in the state. However, critics argue that such rankings do not capture the full scope of the situation in schools, emphasizing the need for a more thorough evaluation of individual student advancement and school environments.

Amid legal disputes regarding grading methodologies, the Texas Education Agency’s A-F rating system is under scrutiny, making Children at Risk’s appraisal one of the primary indicators of academic performance statewide. While these grades are based on similar data as the TEA, the distinct analytical approach raises questions about the true significance of these assessments. Officials suggest that these grades should initiate broader and more nuanced discussions about the quality of education, rather than serving as definitive judgments.

Bob Sanborn, the CEO of Children At Risk, asserts that the rankings aim to inform parents and ensure schools are held responsible. “We aim for parents to have insights into school quality and, more importantly, to advocate for improvements from our state Legislature,” Sanborn expressed. However, Jack Schneider from the Beyond Test Scores Project warns against oversimplifying school quality into a single metric, noting the diverse objectives and priorities among schools and parents.

While some schools like Hoffman Lane Elementary achieve high rankings, others in the Edgewood and South San Antonio ISDs fall behind. These scores do not reflect the ongoing efforts by schools to improve nor the delayed impact of data based on previous academic years. Jimmie Walker, the assistant superintendent of curriculum at Alamo Heights ISD, highlights that these letter grades may not convey the complete narrative to community members seeking detailed educational insights.

Moreover, designations like “Gold Ribbon” for schools in high-poverty areas that perform well acknowledge accomplishments in challenging circumstances. However, Bobby Blount, the President of the Northside ISD board, questions the practice of rating schools differently based on student demographics, suggesting a potential bias within the grading system.

Experts unanimously agree that no rating can replace active parental engagement. For instance, Maira Carrier, a parent who opted for homeschooling after noticing discrepancies between her child’s struggles and the school’s decent grade, emphasized the disparity between ratings and actual student experiences. Carrier’s case and similar stories continue to fuel discussions on the efficacy of the Children at Risk grading system, prompting a reevaluation of the benefits these evaluations offer to the students they represent.