The Hayward Report, officially titled [ppp1], put forward 26 recommendations. Some of these suggestions were straightforward, such as adjusting the Scottish qualifications and assessment system while ensuring that any changes align with the report’s vision and principles.
On the other hand, certain recommendations, especially those regarding the adoption of the Scottish Diploma of Achievement (SDA) as a novel approach to qualifications and assessment, are more intricate. They necessitate meticulous planning and allocation of resources to implement the proposed changes effectively.
The necessity for well-thought-out change has raised concerns among various education stakeholders, including Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth, who engaged with the Scottish Parliament’s Education, Children, and Young People Committee in January.
Amidst prevailing budgetary constraints within both governmental and local authority spheres, the scarcity of resources casts a shadow over every recommendation and largely accounts for Gilruth’s [ppp2].
To assist the education secretary in navigating this terrain, members of School Leaders Scotland were tasked with prioritizing the array of recommendations. They have identified 13 out of the 26 recommendations that should be advanced without delay.
There is a prevailing sentiment that delaying the implementation of changes further will only perpetuate the disadvantage faced by our children due to an outdated qualifications and assessment system.
A consistent viewpoint is the necessity to reduce the reliance on traditional exams and to incorporate elements traditionally associated with academic and vocational learning.
The aspiration to develop a qualifications framework that better equips our children for post-school life and work is encapsulated in the recommendations concerning the SDA.
These recommendations propose a phased introduction of the SDA to ensure that schools grasp the vision, principles, and practical implications of each of its three components (“personal pathway,” “project learning,” and “programmes of learning”).
Challenges in Timetabling
Many school leaders perceive the “programmes of learning” and the “personal pathway” as components of learning already integrated into school timetables. However, implementing the project learning aspect of the SDA poses challenges in practice, as acknowledged by the education secretary.
The fundamental principle of project learning underscores the importance of providing learners with opportunities to apply knowledge from various subjects—both technical and professional—to address challenges.
These experiential learning opportunities mirror real-world scenarios that learners are likely to encounter beyond the confines of school or college, emphasizing skills such as teamwork, investigation, problem-solving, and innovation. All of these skills are invaluable for a curriculum designed to support life after formal education.
While the concept itself is not novel, the emphasis on integrating this holistic approach into the senior phase disrupts the traditional focus on preparing students for five Highers. The concern over timetabling reflects the challenges of accommodating the diverse educational objectives within the constraints of school schedules.
In the context of the senior phase, the argument is made that the primary question in educational planning should shift from “What subjects should we teach?” to “What is important, what matters?”
Wales Leads the Way with Project-Based Learning
If project learning, also known as interdisciplinary learning, is deemed more beneficial for our children in terms of preparing them for life after school and meeting the demands of employers seeking “work-ready” graduates, then a reevaluation of the time allocated to traditional subjects is imperative. This reevaluation should include provisions for project-based learning.
While this concept may spark debate among traditionalists in Scotland, Wales has already embraced this approach by introducing a [ppp3], ensuring that each young person dedicates 60 hours annually to achieve this valuable qualification at multiple levels.
The roadmap for implementation involves collaborative efforts with headteachers, subject teachers, Education Scotland, and other relevant stakeholders to define course content, assessment models, and align teaching methodologies within and across subjects and project elements.
This meticulous planning is essential to prevent redundancy and ensure coherence in language, content, and comprehension.
Continuous Professional Development for Staff
Effectively implementing such a significant shift in educational delivery demands a concurrent professional development program across all schools’ Career-Long Professional Learning (CLPL) initiatives. This initiative aims to equip all staff with the necessary knowledge and skills to deliver project-based learning successfully.
Furthermore, the comprehensive understanding, mapping, implementation, and policy development processes, along with the establishment of assessment models, will require collaborative efforts across multiple schools and agencies over an extended period. The crucial question arises: Who will bear the financial burden?
Ultimately, the primary focus should be on our children’s education and their enhanced prospects in life. However, the reality dictates that without adequate funding, meaningful change may remain elusive. Therefore, it is imperative for all stakeholders to rally behind the call for change.
Peter Bain, the executive headteacher of Oban and Tiree schools (encompassing both secondary and primary sectors), and the president of School Leaders Scotland, underscores the importance of supporting educational reform.
For the most recent updates on Scottish education news, in-depth analysis, and engaging features delivered straight to your inbox, subscribe to Tes magazine.