Skip to Content

### Enhancing Education: The Successes and Failures of Standards-Based Reforms

Receive stories similar to these directly in your email.

The 74 has teamed up with Stanford University’s Hoover Institution to honor the 40th anniversary of the ‘A Nation At Risk’ report. Hoover’s collaboration highlights insights and evaluations from specialists, educators, and policymakers regarding the broader impact of 40 years of education reform and the evolution of America’s educational system since the influential 1983 report. Presented below is the project’s chapter focusing on the key takeaways from the past few decades of implementing standards-based reforms.

During the peak of the education reform movement, “standards-based reform” was akin to the concept of “Everything Everywhere All at Once.” This approach, centered on establishing statewide standards, evaluating student performance against these standards, and enforcing school accountability, formed the core of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) that dominated education policy from the 1990s to the 2010s. Many considered standards-based reform as synonymous with education reform, raising the question of its effectiveness in improving education outcomes.

Assessing the success of standards-based reform hinges on defining its scope and components. Did it prove effective as an overarching strategy? Were specific elements particularly impactful?

While exploring these questions, it becomes evident that the results are not entirely conclusive. The era saw a notable improvement in student achievement, particularly in the late 1990s and early 2000s coinciding with the implementation of standards, tests, and accountability measures. However, attributing this progress solely to these policies is challenging, given the multitude of external factors influencing educational outcomes during that period.

Moreover, the subsequent plateau and decline in student achievement in the 2010s raise questions about the efficacy of accountability measures post-NCLB. The softening of school-level accountability with the transition to the Every Student Succeeds Act and the Common Core State Standards may have contributed to this trend, although concrete evidence remains scarce amidst various concurrent societal shifts.

While standards, testing, and accountability played a role in enhancing student outcomes, the specifics of how schools achieved these improvements remain largely unknown. The lack of insight into the actual strategies employed within classrooms limits a comprehensive understanding of the reform’s impact.

Despite these uncertainties, the era of standards-based reform offers valuable lessons for future endeavors in utilizing standards, assessments, and accountability to enhance educational outcomes. By embracing a holistic approach that integrates various components of reform and prioritizes capacity building within the education system, policymakers can pave the way for more effective and equitable education practices.

The experience of standards-based reform underscores the importance of balancing accountability measures with efforts to enhance instructional practices, curriculum coherence, and overall system capacity. Moving forward, a renewed focus on ensuring coherent, effective, and equitable classroom instruction, coupled with sustained accountability for results, holds the potential to yield substantial improvements in educational outcomes for years to come.

For more insights from the Hoover Institution initiative, please visit the full project page.