Skip to Content

– Urgent Call for Higher Education Reform in Recent Government Report

The recent overview of the Government’s strategy for reforming tertiary education underscores significant deficiencies and indicates progress in a positive direction, as per a recent article.

The initiative undertaken by the Federal Education Minister in collaboration with the AUA holds significant value. While not akin to the reforms that transformed the lives of many Australians, especially given the current circumstances, this forward-looking assessment of higher education signifies a step in the right direction.

The AUA, unveiled on Sunday, February 25, advocates not for minor adjustments to a struggling system but for foundational transformations, such as the concept of “varied roles for different universities.”

This reform is envisioned to span decades rather than mere years, with hints from Clare suggesting a potential alteration to the student debt program in the upcoming May budget. The objective is to double the university student population to 1.8 million by 2050.

The key recommendations put forth for the tertiary education system include establishing a new overarching objective focused on fostering a robust, fair, and resilient democracy while propelling national economic, social, and environmental progress.

Essentially, this report reconsiders the role of universities as mere skill providers overseen by bureaucratic structures fixated on cost reduction. It remains within the ideological confines of economic rationalism but not at the expense of democratic values—an unexpected inclusion in a contemporary tertiary education framework.

Some recommendations are presented in a softer tone, such as enhancing “pathways” by eliminating barriers to education and skills, or reinforcing “modular stackable skills.” Given that this serves as a visionary statement, these broad objectives would subsequently require execution by a proposed entity.

Even before implementation, the report suggests the formation of an “Implementation Advisory Committee” comprising stakeholders and representatives from various sectors within the tertiary education system, indicating a diverse composition.

Among the headline proposals generating quick attention is the suggestion to discard the pricing mechanism introduced by the previous Government, which aimed to increase the cost of arts degrees to steer students away from humanities disciplines towards more vocational courses—an endeavor that proved ineffective. The report proposes transitioning to a student contribution model based on lifetime earnings.

Within this recommendation lies a crucial observation highlighting the imperative need to enhance the quality of learning and teaching. While the mention of “new teaching technologies” raises concerns, the report also advocates for promoting minimum teaching qualifications for higher education instructors.

Many distinguished academics often transition away from teaching roles, leaving part-time instructors on casual contracts to handle teaching responsibilities. Defining the minimum teaching qualifications poses a potential challenge when evaluating the credentials of university educators primarily engaged in teaching rather than research or administrative duties.

The report’s emphasis on improving the quality of learning and teaching presents a compelling avenue for further exploration, provided that the stakeholders and participants in the tertiary education system can transcend the constraints of economic rationalism. A departure from neoliberal jargon towards a more philosophical, ethical, and historical discourse could enrich these endeavors.

Furthermore, the report acknowledges Australia’s universities’ notable contributions to Research and Development (R&D) despite relatively low R&D expenditure for an advanced economy.

A noteworthy recommendation calls for increased utilization of university research by all Australian governments to address critical economic, social, health, and environmental challenges—a move that prompts reflection on why this collaboration is not already a standard practice.

The report also highlights the distinguished panel of “eminent Australians” entrusted with the review process, including the chair who oversees multiple boards, including a respite care organization. The consulting work was conducted in collaboration with a reputable consultancy firm frequently engaged by the government, ensuring a comprehensive assessment of the issues at hand.

Clare adeptly presented the report, drawing from personal experiences to underscore the challenges faced by regional students and articulating the significance of tertiary education in shaping the future workforce.

While the report’s release may not immediately alter Australia’s skepticism towards experts, the prevailing bias against universities as elitist institutions, and the glorification of self-made individuals, it does offer a refreshing blend of practical insights into the future of tertiary education intertwined with societal aspirations and needs.

This discourse is intricately linked to the ongoing conversation about educational equity in schools, underscoring the interdependence of these dialogues.

[embedded content]

The author, a former journalist specializing in books and arts, was originally based in Melbourne and later in Brisbane before establishing the Bendigo Writers Festival in regional Victoria, where she served as the festival director for 13 years.

Support independent journalism through IA.